People v. Lema-Naula

200 N.Y.S.3d 105, 222 A.D.3d 997, 2023 NY Slip Op 06753
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 27, 2023
DocketInd. No. 128/20
StatusPublished

This text of 200 N.Y.S.3d 105 (People v. Lema-Naula) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Lema-Naula, 200 N.Y.S.3d 105, 222 A.D.3d 997, 2023 NY Slip Op 06753 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

People v Lema-Naula (2023 NY Slip Op 06753)
People v Lema-Naula
2023 NY Slip Op 06753
Decided on December 27, 2023
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on December 27, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, J.P.
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
DEBORAH A. DOWLING
HELEN VOUTSINAS, JJ.

2022-04901
(Ind. No. 128/20)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Segundo Armando Lema-Naula, appellant.


James D. Licata, New City, NY (Lois Cappelletti of counsel), for appellant.

Thomas E. Walsh II, District Attorney, New City, NY (James A. Dolan of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Larry J. Schwartz, J.), rendered June 4, 2021, convicting him of rape in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256). The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d at 255-256).

BRATHWAITE NELSON, J.P., MALTESE, DOWLING and VOUTSINAS, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Acting Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
200 N.Y.S.3d 105, 222 A.D.3d 997, 2023 NY Slip Op 06753, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lema-naula-nyappdiv-2023.