People v. Lefrois

138 A.D.2d 943
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 4, 1988·No. Appeal No. 3·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed, in accordance with the following memorandum: The record unequivocally indicates that the charge of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree was dismissed by the court during the plea colloquy. Since the amended certificate of conviction shows that defendant was sentenced on that charge, we modify the judgment by reversing that conviction and by vacating the sentence imposed thereon.

The remaining claims advanced by defendant lack merit [944] and do not warrant reversal (see, People v Hood, 62 NY2d 863; People v Garrett, 125 AD2d 329). (Appeal from judgment of Ontario County Court, Reed, J. — burglary, second degree, and other charges.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Lefrois, 138 A.D.2d 943 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

138 A.D.2d 943 (People v. Lefrois) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lamphier
302 A.D.2d 864 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
People v. LeFrois
155 A.D.2d 949 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)