People v. Lee

96 A.D.3d 612, 946 N.Y.S.2d 858
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Lee. Read the opinion of the Court — 80 A.D.3d 877

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Bruce Allen, J), entered on or about October 11, 2011, which adjudicated defendant a level two sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court providently exercised its discretion in granting a downward departure to risk level two while declining to grant a further departure (see People v Mingo, 12 NY3d 563, 568 n 2 [2009]; People v Johnson, 11 NY3d 416, 421 [2008]). The court properly determined, after balancing the evidence of defendant’s rehabilitative efforts against the extreme seriousness of his criminal conduct, that a downward departure to the lowest risk level would not be warranted. Concur — Tom, J.P., Andrias, Friedman, Moskowitz and Renwick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Lee, 96 A.D.3d 612, 946 N.Y.S.2d 858 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

96 A.D.3d 612 (People v. Lee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Mingo
910 N.E.2d 983 (New York Court of Appeals, 2009)
People v. Johnson
900 N.E.2d 930 (New York Court of Appeals, 2008)