People v. Lee

288 A.D.2d 398, 733 N.Y.S.2d 628, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11227
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Lee. Read the opinion of the Court — 275 A.D.2d 995

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County [399]*399(Rios, J.), rendered November 29, 1999, convicting him of assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the People failed to prove that the complainant suffered a “physical injury” within the meaning of the Penal Law as the result of being struck by a “dangerous instrument” (Penal Law § 120.05 [2]). However, viewing the evidence adduced at trial in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

The Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s challenge of a prospective juror for cause. The record does not support a finding that the prospective juror possessed “a state of mind that [was] likely to preclude [her] from rendering an impartial verdict based upon evidence adduced at the trial” (CPL 270.20 [1] [b]), or that there was a “substantial risk” that she would be unable to discharge her responsibilities as a juror (People v Williams, 63 NY2d 882, 885; see, People v Dempsey, 217 AD2d 705). S. Miller, J. P., Luciano, Schmidt and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Lee, 288 A.D.2d 398, 733 N.Y.S.2d 628, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11227 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

288 A.D.2d 398 (People v. Lee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Williams
472 N.E.2d 1026 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
People v. Dempsey
217 A.D.2d 705 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)