People v. Lee

211 A.D.2d 563, 621 N.Y.S.2d 871, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 503
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 24, 1995
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 211 A.D.2d 563 (People v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Lee, 211 A.D.2d 563, 621 N.Y.S.2d 871, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 503 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Budd Goodman, J.), rendered September 30, 1991, which convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of manslaughter in the second degree and sentenced him to a term of 1 to 3 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant claims that his admissions at the plea proceeding do not establish his guilt of manslaughter in the second degree and that the court erred in denying his pro se motion to withdraw his plea without a hearing. Defendant’s former claim is unpreserved since he failed to raise it in his pro se motion, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to do so, we would find it to be without merit. Defendant admitted that he was responsible for the care of his [564]*564infant son one week prior to his son’s death, and that he failed to provide the infant with adequate food and water, and to bring the infant to a doctor for medical care. Further, reversal is not warranted inasmuch as the record reveals that the plea was knowingly and voluntarily entered with the assistance of counsel, and there is no suggestion that the plea was improvident or baseless (People v Maynor, 177 AD2d 602, lv denied 79 NY2d 950, and cases cited therein). Defendant’s latter claim, while preserved, is also without merit inasmuch as defendant’s claims of coercion and innocence are belied by the minutes of the plea proceeding (People v Campbell, 200 AD2d 364, lv denied 83 NY2d 869). We note that defendant was offered a reasonable opportunity to present his contentions to the court in his pro se motion to withdraw the plea and in his oral representations to the court at sentencing (People v Sutter, 186 AD2d 351, lv denied 80 NY2d 1030). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Wallach, Kupferman and Ross, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Gray
235 A.D.2d 298 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
People v. Rodriguez
216 A.D.2d 40 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
211 A.D.2d 563, 621 N.Y.S.2d 871, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lee-nyappdiv-1995.