People v. Lee

56 A.D.2d 818, 393 N.Y.S.2d 20, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11119
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Lee. Read the opinion of the Court — 55 A.D.2d 658

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, rendered after trial to a jury, October 25, 1974, unanimously modified, on the law, to vacate the convictions for attempted petit larceny and possession of a weapon and to dismiss those counts, and otherwise to affirm the conviction of attempted robbery, first degree. "Defendant, on the facts of this case, could not have committed the robbery [here an attempt] without also committing the grand larceny [here the two counts dismissed], the counts being inclusory and concurrent (CPL 300.30, subd 4; People v Hayes, 43 AD2d 99, affd 35 NY2d 907). Where the verdict is comprised of inclusory concurrent counts a verdict of guilty on the greatest count is deemed a dismissal of every lesser count (CPL 300.40, subd 3, par [b]).” (People v Grier, 37 NY2d 847, 848.) Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Lupiano, Silverman, Lane and Markewich, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Lee, 56 A.D.2d 818, 393 N.Y.S.2d 20, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11119 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

56 A.D.2d 818 (People v. Lee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Hayes
324 N.E.2d 365 (New York Court of Appeals, 1974)
People v. Grier
340 N.E.2d 471 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
People v. Hayes
43 A.D.2d 99 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1973)