People v. Leath

273 A.D.2d 410, 711 N.Y.S.2d 328, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7008
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 19, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 273 A.D.2d 410 (People v. Leath) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Leath, 273 A.D.2d 410, 711 N.Y.S.2d 328, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7008 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Thomas, J.), rendered July 24, 1997, convicting him of murder in the second degree and arson in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress statements made by him to law enforcement officials.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

[411]*411Contrary to the defendant’s contention, there was probable cause to arrest him. A police officer may arrest a person without a warrant when he has probable cause to believe that that person has committed a crime (see, People v Cruz,. 191 AD2d 507). Here, statements given by the victim to a friend and a police officer provided probable cause to arrest the defendant. Since there was probable cause for the defendant’s arrest, his statements were admissible.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are without merit. S. Miller, J. P., Altman, H. Miller and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Leath
2020 NY Slip Op 3247 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
People v. Jansson
305 A.D.2d 942 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
273 A.D.2d 410, 711 N.Y.S.2d 328, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7008, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-leath-nyappdiv-2000.