People v. Lazarus

159 A.D.2d 1027, 552 N.Y.S.2d 722, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3405
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 16, 1990·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and indictment dismissed. Memorandum: Defendant’s motion to suppress the physical evidence seized from defendant’s vehicle and from his person should have been granted. Although the vehicle was lawfully stopped for speeding, the officer’s alleged observation of cigarette-rolling paper in the center console and a hand-rolled cigarette butt in the ashtray did not constitute probable cause for a search of the vehicle (see, People v Baldon, 51 AD2d 880; People v Franklin, 46 AD2d 189). While questioning defendant on matters unrelated to the speeding charge, the Trooper asked defendant if he could look in the car, and defendant told him to go ahead. Permission to look into the vehicle did not amount to consent to search the vehicle (see, People v Guzman, 153 AD2d 320). (Appeal from judgment of Cayuga County Court, Corning, J. — criminal possession of controlled substance, fourth degree.) Present — Denman, J. P., Green, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Lazarus, 159 A.D.2d 1027, 552 N.Y.S.2d 722, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3405 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

159 A.D.2d 1027 (People v. Lazarus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Hall
35 A.D.3d 1171 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People v. Love
273 A.D.2d 842 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
People v. Saunders
161 A.D.2d 1202 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)