People v. Lazarus
This text of 159 A.D.2d 1027 (People v. Lazarus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and indictment dismissed. Memorandum: Defendant’s motion to suppress the physical evidence seized from defendant’s vehicle and from his person should have been granted. Although the vehicle was lawfully stopped for speeding, the officer’s alleged observation of cigarette-rolling paper in the center console and a hand-rolled cigarette butt in the ashtray did not constitute probable cause for a search of the vehicle (see, People v Baldon, 51 AD2d 880; People v Franklin, 46 AD2d 189). While questioning defendant on matters unrelated to the speeding charge, the Trooper asked defendant if he could look in the car, and defendant told him to go ahead. Permission to look into the vehicle did not amount to consent to search the vehicle (see, People v Guzman, 153 AD2d 320). (Appeal from judgment of Cayuga County Court, Corning, J. — criminal possession of controlled substance, fourth degree.) Present — Denman, J. P., Green, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
159 A.D.2d 1027, 552 N.Y.S.2d 722, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3405, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lazarus-nyappdiv-1990.