People v. Lazaro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Lazaro

71 A.D.2d 926, 419 N.Y.S.2d 882, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13178

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 20, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 71 A.D.2d 926 (People v. Lazaro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Lazaro, 71 A.D.2d 926, 419 N.Y.S.2d 882, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13178 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered March 23, 1978, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment modified, on the law, by reversing the conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and the sentence imposed thereon, and the said count is dismissed. As so modified, judgment affirmed. Under the facts herein, the possession count was an inclusory concurrent count of the charge of criminal sale of a controlled substance. O’Connor, J. P., Rabin, Gulotta and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered March 23, 1978, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment modified, on the law, by reversing the conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and the sentence imposed thereon, and the said count is dismissed. As so modified, judgment affirmed. Under the facts herein, the possession count was an inclusory concurrent count of the charge of criminal sale of a controlled substance. O’Connor, J. P., Rabin, Gulotta and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 A.D.2d 926, 419 N.Y.S.2d 882, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lazaro-nyappdiv-1979.