People v. Lawson

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Lawson

208 N.E.2d 466, 16 N.Y.2d 552, 260 N.Y.S.2d 661, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1359

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 20, 1965

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 208 N.E.2d 466 (People v. Lawson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Lawson, 208 N.E.2d 466, 16 N.Y.2d 552, 260 N.Y.S.2d 661, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1359 (N.Y. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed upon the opinion at the Appellate Term; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld and Bergan. Judges Van Voorhis, Burke and Scileppi dissent and vote to reverse and to reinstate the conviction of defendants upon the ground that the word “ intrude ” under section 2036 of the Penal Law includes remaining upon the premises after having been ordered lawfully to vacate (People v. Stevens, 109 N. Y. 159; 1 Restatement, Torts, § 77, subd. [b] ; § 158; Prosser, Torts [1st ed.], p. 89).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed upon the opinion at the Appellate Term; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld and Bergan. Judges Van Voorhis, Burke and Scileppi dissent and vote to reverse and to reinstate the conviction of defendants upon the ground that the word “ intrude ” under section 2036 of the Penal Law includes remaining upon the premises after having been ordered lawfully to vacate (People v. Stevens, 109 N. Y. 159; 1 Restatement, Torts, § 77, subd. [b] ; § 158; Prosser, Torts [1st ed.], p. 89).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

208 N.E.2d 466, 16 N.Y.2d 552, 260 N.Y.S.2d 661, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lawson-ny-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack