People v. Lawlor

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Lawlor

492 N.E.2d 1229, 67 N.Y.2d 904, 501 N.Y.S.2d 813, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 18004

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 1, 1986

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 492 N.E.2d 1229 (People v. Lawlor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Lawlor, 492 N.E.2d 1229, 67 N.Y.2d 904, 501 N.Y.S.2d 813, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 18004 (N.Y. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), appeal dismissed upon the ground that the Appellate Term’s determination of reversal was not on the law alone or upon the law and such facts which, but for the determination of law, would not have led to reversal (CPL 450.90 [2] [a]). Although the Appellate Term stated that its reversal was on the law, it was based on a claimed error which was not preserved and does not present a question of law for review by this court (People v Dercole, 52 NY2d 956). In view of the dismissal of the appeal we have not reached the merits and our disposition may not be considered approval of the ruling below that defendant was not properly informed of his statutory right to be represented by an attorney.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), appeal dismissed upon the ground that the Appellate Term’s determination of reversal was not on the law alone or upon the law and such facts which, but for the determination of law, would not have led to reversal (CPL 450.90 [2] [a]). Although the Appellate Term stated that its reversal was on the law, it was based on a claimed error which was not preserved and does not present a question of law for review by this court (People v Dercole, 52 NY2d 956). In view of the dismissal of the appeal we have not reached the merits and our disposition may not be considered approval of the ruling below that defendant was not properly informed of his statutory right to be represented by an attorney.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

492 N.E.2d 1229, 67 N.Y.2d 904, 501 N.Y.S.2d 813, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 18004, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lawlor-ny-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack