People v. Lawhorn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Lawhorn

2017 NY Slip Op 8636, 156 A.D.3d 462, 64 N.Y.S.3d 887, 2017 WL 6327567

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 12, 2017

Docket5183 2524/12

StatusPublished

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 8636 (People v. Lawhorn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Lawhorn, 2017 NY Slip Op 8636, 156 A.D.3d 462, 64 N.Y.S.3d 887, 2017 WL 6327567 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Juan M. Merchan, J.), rendered March 11, 2013, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of grand larceny in the fourth degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of two to four years, unanimously affirmed.

The court correctly declined to submit the lesser included offenses of petit larceny and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree. Nothing in the record casts doubt on the People’s extensive and uniform evidence establishing that the selling price of the jacket defendant stole exceeded $1000. Accordingly, there was no reasonable view of the evidence that defendant committed the lesser offenses, but not the greater (see e.g. People v Nashal, 130 AD3d 480, 482 [1st Dept 2015], lv denied 26 NY3d 1010 [2015]). The speculative possibilities asserted by defendant under which the jacket might have had a value below the statutory threshold do not constitute an “identifiable, rational basis on which the jury could reject a portion of the prosecution’s case which is indispensable to establishment of the higher crime and yet accept so much of the proof as would establish the lesser crime” (People v Scarborough, 49 NY2d 364, 369-370 [1980]).

Concur—Tom, J.P., Renwick, Gische, Oing and Singh, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Juan M. Merchan, J.), rendered March 11, 2013, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of grand larceny in the fourth degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of two to four years, unanimously affirmed.

The court correctly declined to submit the lesser included offenses of petit larceny and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree. Nothing in the record casts doubt on the People’s extensive and uniform evidence establishing that the selling price of the jacket defendant stole exceeded $1000. Accordingly, there was no reasonable view of the evidence that defendant committed the lesser offenses, but not the greater (see e.g. People v Nashal, 130 AD3d 480, 482 [1st Dept 2015], lv denied 26 NY3d 1010 [2015]). The speculative possibilities asserted by defendant under which the jacket might have had a value below the statutory threshold do not constitute an “identifiable, rational basis on which the jury could reject a portion of the prosecution’s case which is indispensable to establishment of the higher crime and yet accept so much of the proof as would establish the lesser crime” (People v Scarborough, 49 NY2d 364, 369-370 [1980]).

Concur—Tom, J.P., Renwick, Gische, Oing and Singh, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2017 NY Slip Op 8636, 156 A.D.3d 462, 64 N.Y.S.3d 887, 2017 WL 6327567, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lawhorn-nyappdiv-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack