People v. Law

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Law

134 A.D.2d 285, 520 N.Y.S.2d 367, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50469

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 2, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 134 A.D.2d 285 (People v. Law) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Law, 134 A.D.2d 285, 520 N.Y.S.2d 367, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50469 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lakritz, J.), [286]*286rendered April 3, 1984, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (three counts), robbery in the second degree (six counts), criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, and criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The record indicates that the court accepted the jointly represented defendant’s guilty plea after it ascertained that the defendant’s decision to proceed with his attorney was an informed decision (see, People v Gomberg, 38 NY2d 307; People v Monroe, 54 NY2d 35, cert denied 455 US 947). Mangano, J. P., Thompson, Lawrence and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lakritz, J.), [286]*286rendered April 3, 1984, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (three counts), robbery in the second degree (six counts), criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, and criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The record indicates that the court accepted the jointly represented defendant’s guilty plea after it ascertained that the defendant’s decision to proceed with his attorney was an informed decision (see, People v Gomberg, 38 NY2d 307; People v Monroe, 54 NY2d 35, cert denied 455 US 947). Mangano, J. P., Thompson, Lawrence and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

134 A.D.2d 285, 520 N.Y.S.2d 367, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-law-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack