People v. Law

55 A.D.2d 881, 390 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10076
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Law. Read the opinion of the Court — 48 A.D.2d 228

Opinion

this appeal from a judgment, rendered on January 17, 1974, in the Supreme Court, New York County, convicting defendant on his plea of guilty of attempted possession of a weapon as a class E felony and sentencing him to an indeterminate period of imprisonment not to exceed three years, assigned counsel, after conscientiously examining the record, has sought leave to withdraw. The application is supported by a brief in compliance with People v Saunders (52 AD2d 833) (see, also, Anders v California, 386 US 738). Counsel has concluded that the record in this case does not reveal any valid appealable issue, and that the appeal is, in effect, frivolous. After a review of the record and proceedings in this case, this court agrees with counsel for appellant that there are no issues to be raised on this appeal that would not be frivolous. Accordingly, the application by counsel to withdraw is granted, and the judgment of conviction is unanimously affirmed. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Murphy, Birns, Silverman and Nunez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Law, 55 A.D.2d 881, 390 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10076 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

55 A.D.2d 881 (People v. Law) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Saunders
52 A.D.2d 833 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)