People v. Lavon
This text of 179 A.D.2d 826 (People v. Lavon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[827]*827The Supreme Court, Kings County, held the required hearing and found that the prosecutor had not exercised her peremptory challenges in a racially discriminatory manner. We agree. The prosecutor was able to articulate a race-neutral reason for each of her challenges (see, People v Hernandez, 75 NY2d 350, affd 500 US —, 111 S Ct 1859).
The defendant also contends that he was denied a fair trial by a jury in whose selection he had a voice when the Trial Judge discharged the jury foreperson. This matter has not been preserved for our review because of the defendant’s failure to object at the time of the replacement (see, People v Fernandez, 137 AD2d 709; People v Burns, 118 AD2d 864). Harwood, J. P., Lawrence, Balletta and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
179 A.D.2d 826, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lavon-nyappdiv-1992.