People v. Lavender

503 N.E.2d 121, 68 N.Y.2d 995, 510 N.Y.S.2d 565, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 20949
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 25, 1986·Published

Opinion

Appeal dismissed. Our examination of the decision of the Appellate Division reveals that an alternative ground for its holding — the trial court’s failure to respond to proper questions from the jury — was not preserved for appellate review. Thus, the order of reversal appealed from, notwithstanding its recital that it rests solely "on the law”, is not based "on the law alone or upon the law and such facts which, but for the determination of law, would not have led to reversal” (CPL *996 450.90 [2] [a]; see generally, People v Gonzalez, 68 NY2d 995 [decided herewith]; People v Dercole, 52 NY2d 956).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Lavender, 503 N.E.2d 121, 68 N.Y.2d 995, 510 N.Y.S.2d 565, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 20949 (N.Y. 1986).

503 N.E.2d 121 (People v. Lavender) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Dercole
419 N.E.2d 869 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Gonzalez
503 N.E.2d 120 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)