People v. Laurange
This text of 159 A.D.2d 895 (People v. Laurange) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant’s sole contention on appeal is that County Court erred at sentencing by failing to ask defendant if he wished to make a statement prior to the pronouncement of sentence (see, CPL 380.50). We have held that where, as here, no objection was made to the sentencing court’s oversight, the error has not been preserved for review (see, People v Vega-Freire, 148 AD2d 851), and we find no basis for the exercise of our discretion to reverse in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15).
Judgment affirmed. Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Weiss, Mikoll and Yesawich, Jr., JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
159 A.D.2d 895, 554 N.Y.S.2d 1021, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-laurange-nyappdiv-1990.