People v. Lauradin
104 A.D.3d 875, 960 N.Y.S.2d 652
Opinion
Appeal by the de[876] fendant, as limited by her motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Buchter, J.), imposed June 6, 2011, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant’s valid waiver of her right to appeal precludes review of her contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737 [2006]; cf. People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257 [2011]). Eng, P.J., Dillon, Chambers and Austin, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Lauradin, 104 A.D.3d 875, 960 N.Y.S.2d 652 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).
104 A.D.3d 875 (People v. Lauradin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Ramos
853 N.E.2d 222 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)