People v. Laughlin

621 P.2d 1388, 1981 Colo. LEXIS 576
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedJanuary 19, 1981
DocketNo. 28507
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 621 P.2d 1388 (People v. Laughlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Laughlin, 621 P.2d 1388, 1981 Colo. LEXIS 576 (Colo. 1981).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the district attorney from an order dismissing an indictment against Jon K. Laughlin. The Routt County Grand Jury indicted the defendant on two counts of first degree official misconduct. Section 18-8-404(l)(a), C.R.S. 1973 (1978 Repl. Vol. 8). The defendant filed a motion to dismiss, asserting that the indictment was not supported by evidence that established probable cause that the offenses charged were committed by the defendant. Section 16-5-204(4)(k), C.R.S. 1973 (1978 Repl. Vol. 8). The district judge assigned to hear the motion reviewed the record before the grand jury, conferred with counsel in chambers, and, after a hearing on the motion, dismissed the indictment.

In considering the motion, the trial judge declared that he was using the same test to determine the sufficiency of the indictment that would be used at a preliminary hearing to determine probable cause. See People v. Summers, 197 Colo. 445, 593 P.2d 969 (1979). Section 16-5-204(4)(k), C.R.S. 1973 (1978 Repl. Vol. 8), provides:

“The district court before which the indicted defendant is to be tried shall dismiss any indictment of the grand jury if such district court finds, upon the filing of a motion by the indicted defendant based upon the grand jury record without argument or further evidence, that the grand jury finding of probable cause is not supported by the record.”

The trial judge, with probable cause as the criteria for determining the sufficiency of the record to support the indictment, concluded that the record was insufficient to support the charges contained in the indictment and dismissed the case. We therefore affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Gallegos
260 P.3d 15 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 2010)
People v. Armstrong
664 P.2d 713 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
621 P.2d 1388, 1981 Colo. LEXIS 576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-laughlin-colo-1981.