People v. Latture

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Latture

10 A.D.2d 580, 195 N.Y.S.2d 680, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12172

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 18, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 10 A.D.2d 580 (People v. Latture) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Latture, 10 A.D.2d 580, 195 N.Y.S.2d 680, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12172 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal (1) from a judgment rendered by the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Queens County, sentencing appellant, after he had been found guilty of assault in the third degree, to serve three months, execution of which sentence was suspended, and (2) from each and every intermediate order therein made, including an order denying a motion made pursuant to section 465 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to reopen the proceedings for the purpose of introducing additional evidence to set aside the verdict and to grant a new trial. Judgment unanimously affirmed. No opinion. No separate appeal lies from the intermediate orders, which have been reviewed on the appeal from the judgment of conviction. Present — Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal (1) from a judgment rendered by the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Queens County, sentencing appellant, after he had been found guilty of assault in the third degree, to serve three months, execution of which sentence was suspended, and (2) from each and every intermediate order therein made, including an order denying a motion made pursuant to section 465 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to reopen the proceedings for the purpose of introducing additional evidence to set aside the verdict and to grant a new trial. Judgment unanimously affirmed. No opinion. No separate appeal lies from the intermediate orders, which have been reviewed on the appeal from the judgment of conviction. Present — Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 A.D.2d 580, 195 N.Y.S.2d 680, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-latture-nyappdiv-1960.