People v. Lattanzio

55 A.D.2d 629, 389 N.Y.S.2d 556, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15364

This text of 55 A.D.2d 629 (People v. Lattanzio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Lattanzio, 55 A.D.2d 629, 389 N.Y.S.2d 556, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15364 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

? by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated November 7, 1975, which, after a hearing, granted a motion to controvert a search warrant and suppress physical evidence seized pursuant thereto. Order reversed, on the law, and motion denied. There are no controverted questions of fact. The affidavit was sufficient to establish probable cause and, consequently, the warrant was valid, the search lawful, and the evidence seized admissible (see Aguilar v Texas, 378 US 108; People v Hendricks, 25 NY2d 129). Martuscello, Acting P. J., Latham, Hawkins and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Aguilar v. Texas
378 U.S. 108 (Supreme Court, 1964)
People v. Hendricks
250 N.E.2d 323 (New York Court of Appeals, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
55 A.D.2d 629, 389 N.Y.S.2d 556, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15364, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lattanzio-nyappdiv-1976.