People v. Latimore

2020 NY Slip Op 792, 179 A.D.3d 1551, 114 N.Y.S.3d 923
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 31, 2020
Docket1311 KA 15-01807
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 2020 NY Slip Op 792 (People v. Latimore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Latimore, 2020 NY Slip Op 792, 179 A.D.3d 1551, 114 N.Y.S.3d 923 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

People v Latimore (2020 NY Slip Op 00792)
People v Latimore
2020 NY Slip Op 00792
Decided on January 31, 2020
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on January 31, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., PERADOTTO, TROUTMAN, AND BANNISTER, JJ.

1311 KA 15-01807

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

SHAQUAN O. LATIMORE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.


TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (JANET C. SOMES OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (SCOTT MYLES OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.



Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (James J. Piampiano, J.), rendered August 11, 2015. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon on school grounds.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of, inter alia, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (Penal Law § 265.03 [3]). Contrary to defendant's contention, his valid waiver of the right to appeal forecloses review of County Court's discretionary decision to deny defendant youthful offender status (see People v Pacherille, 25 NY3d 1021, 1024 [2015]) and also "forecloses review of [his] request that we exercise our interest of justice jurisdiction to adjudicate him a youthful offender" (People v Allen, 174 AD3d 1456, 1458 [4th Dept 2019], lv denied 34 NY3d 978 [2019]).

Entered: January 31, 2020

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Hinson
2024 NY Slip Op 03939 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
People v. Meridy
2021 NY Slip Op 02894 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 NY Slip Op 792, 179 A.D.3d 1551, 114 N.Y.S.3d 923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-latimore-nyappdiv-2020.