People v. Lathan

191 N.E.2d 668, 13 N.Y.2d 670
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 9, 1963
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 191 N.E.2d 668 (People v. Lathan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Lathan, 191 N.E.2d 668, 13 N.Y.2d 670 (N.Y. 1963).

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there were pre[671]*671sented and necessarily passed upon questions under the Constitution of the United States as follows: Appellant contended that the admission into evidence of his confession was a denial and deprivation of his rights under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States for the reason that it was involuntary and that it was obtained in the absence of counsel subsequent to his arraignment on charges not related to the crime for which he was later indicted and convicted. The Court of Appeals held that there was no such denial or deprivation. [See 12 N Y 2d 822.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Butler v. Rundle
206 A.2d 283 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
191 N.E.2d 668, 13 N.Y.2d 670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lathan-ny-1963.