People v. Laster

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Laster

166 A.D.2d 216, 562 N.Y.S.2d 397, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11711

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 9, 1990

StatusPublished

This text of 166 A.D.2d 216 (People v. Laster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Laster, 166 A.D.2d 216, 562 N.Y.S.2d 397, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11711 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edwin Torres, J.), rendered on June 30, 1988, convicting defendant of one count of robbery in the first degree and two counts of robbery in the second degree and sentencing him to concurrent, indeterminate terms of imprisonment of 12½ to 25 years and 7½ to 15 years, respectively, is unanimously affirmed.

We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or severe. Taking into account, "among other things, the crime charged, the particular circumstances of the individual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction”, we perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction in sentence. (People v Farrar, 52 NY2d 302, 305.) Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Milonas, Asch and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edwin Torres, J.), rendered on June 30, 1988, convicting defendant of one count of robbery in the first degree and two counts of robbery in the second degree and sentencing him to concurrent, indeterminate terms of imprisonment of 12½ to 25 years and 7½ to 15 years, respectively, is unanimously affirmed.

We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or severe. Taking into account, "among other things, the crime charged, the particular circumstances of the individual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction”, we perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction in sentence. (People v Farrar, 52 NY2d 302, 305.) Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Milonas, Asch and Rubin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

166 A.D.2d 216, 562 N.Y.S.2d 397, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11711, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-laster-nyappdiv-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack