People v. Last

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Last

279 A.D.2d 591, 719 N.Y.S.2d 599, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 598

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 22, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 279 A.D.2d 591 (People v. Last) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Last, 279 A.D.2d 591, 719 N.Y.S.2d 599, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 598 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (J. Goldberg, J.), rendered May 1, 1998, convicting him of insurance- fraud in the third degree (two counts), conspiracy in the fifth degree, and falsely reporting an incident in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v Williams, 84 NY2d 925, 926).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Bracken, Acting P. J., Altman, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (J. Goldberg, J.), rendered May 1, 1998, convicting him of insurance- fraud in the third degree (two counts), conspiracy in the fifth degree, and falsely reporting an incident in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v Williams, 84 NY2d 925, 926).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Bracken, Acting P. J., Altman, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

279 A.D.2d 591, 719 N.Y.S.2d 599, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-last-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack