People v. Lassic

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Lassic

254 A.D.2d 303, 678 N.Y.S.2d 281, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10086

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 5, 1998

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 254 A.D.2d 303 (People v. Lassic) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Lassic, 254 A.D.2d 303, 678 N.Y.S.2d 281, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10086 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County [304]*304(Thorp, J.), rendered October 15, 1993, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts), robbery in the second degree (two counts), criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the hearing court properly determined that the stop of his vehicle was based on reasonable suspicion (see, People v Hicks, 68 NY2d 234; People v De Bour, 40 NY2d 210; People v Ryan, 224 AD2d 644; People v Bianchi, 208 AD2d 551, 552, affd 85 NY2d 1022; People v Mills, 198 AD2d 236; People v Bedoya, 190 AD2d 812). Consequently, the evidence recovered as a result of the stop was admissible.

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County [304]*304(Thorp, J.), rendered October 15, 1993, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts), robbery in the second degree (two counts), criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the hearing court properly determined that the stop of his vehicle was based on reasonable suspicion (see, People v Hicks, 68 NY2d 234; People v De Bour, 40 NY2d 210; People v Ryan, 224 AD2d 644; People v Bianchi, 208 AD2d 551, 552, affd 85 NY2d 1022; People v Mills, 198 AD2d 236; People v Bedoya, 190 AD2d 812). Consequently, the evidence recovered as a result of the stop was admissible.

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 A.D.2d 303, 678 N.Y.S.2d 281, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10086, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lassic-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack