People v. Lassalle

114 A.D.3d 1226, 979 N.Y.S.2d 917
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 7, 2014·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Motion for writ of error coram nobis granted. Memorandum: Defendant contends that he was denied effective assistance of appellate counsel because counsel failed to raise an issue on direct appeal that would have resulted in reversal, specifically, County Court erred in failing to advise defendant prior to the entry of his plea that his sentence would include a period of postrelease supervision. Upon our review of the motion papers, we conclude that the issue may have merit. Therefore, the order of October 3, 2008 is vacated and this Court will consider the appeal de novo (see People v LeFrois, 151 AD2d 1046 [1989]). Defendant is directed to file and serve his records and briefs with this Court on or before May 23, 2014. Present — Scudder, PJ., Smith, Centra, Fahey and Lindley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Lassalle, 114 A.D.3d 1226, 979 N.Y.S.2d 917 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

114 A.D.3d 1226 (People v. Lassalle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

LASSALLE, JARVIS, PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015
People v. Lassalle
126 A.D.3d 1378 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)