People v. Lassalle

114 A.D.3d 1226, 979 N.Y.S.2d 917

This text of 114 A.D.3d 1226 (People v. Lassalle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Lassalle, 114 A.D.3d 1226, 979 N.Y.S.2d 917 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Motion for writ of error coram nobis granted. Memorandum: Defendant contends that he was denied effective assistance of appellate counsel because counsel failed to raise an issue on direct appeal that would have resulted in reversal, specifically, County Court erred in failing to advise defendant prior to the entry of his plea that his sentence would include a period of postrelease supervision. Upon our review of the motion papers, we conclude that the issue may have merit. Therefore, the order of October 3, 2008 is vacated and this Court will consider the appeal de novo (see People v LeFrois, 151 AD2d 1046 [1989]). Defendant is directed to file and serve his records and briefs with this Court on or before May 23, 2014. Present — Scudder, PJ., Smith, Centra, Fahey and Lindley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. LeFrois
151 A.D.2d 1046 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 A.D.3d 1226, 979 N.Y.S.2d 917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lassalle-nyappdiv-2014.