People v. Lashway

90 A.D.3d 1178, 933 N.Y.2d 922
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 8, 2011
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 90 A.D.3d 1178 (People v. Lashway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Lashway, 90 A.D.3d 1178, 933 N.Y.2d 922 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

Stein, J.

In view of the People’s concession that defendant was entitled to a hearing on the merits of his' application and to be represented by counsel thereat, we remit this matter to County Court for further proceedings pursuant to Correction Law § I68-0.

[1179]*1179Spain, J.E, Rose, Malone Jr. and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is reversed, without costs, and matter remitted to the County Court of Clinton County for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court’s decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lashway
2024 NY Slip Op 02234 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
The People v. Steven Lashway
34 N.E.3d 847 (New York Court of Appeals, 2015)
People v. Runko
105 A.D.3d 927 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People v. Hazen
103 A.D.3d 943 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
90 A.D.3d 1178, 933 N.Y.2d 922, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lashway-nyappdiv-2011.