People v. Lashbrooks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Lashbrooks

67 A.D.3d 1204, 888 N.Y.S.2d 440

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 19, 2009

StatusPublished

This text of 67 A.D.3d 1204 (People v. Lashbrooks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Lashbrooks, 67 A.D.3d 1204, 888 N.Y.S.2d 440 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from [1205]*1205a judgment of the County Court of St. Lawrence County (Richards, J.), rendered September 2, 2008, convicting defendant upon her plea of guilty of the crime of attempted criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree.

Defendant agreed to be prosecuted by a superior court information charging her with criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree. In satisfaction thereof, she pleaded guilty to attempted criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree and waived her right to appeal. In accordance with the terms of the plea agreement, she was sentenced as a second felony offender to IV2 to 3 years in prison, with the recommendation that she be considered for acceptance into the shock incarceration program. Defendant now appeals.

Appellate counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment of representing defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues to be raised on appeal. Based upon our review of the record and counsel’s brief, we agree. Therefore, the judgment is affirmed and counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]; see generally People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633 [2001]).

Peters, J.P., Kane, Malone Jr., McCarthy and Garry, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from [1205]*1205a judgment of the County Court of St. Lawrence County (Richards, J.), rendered September 2, 2008, convicting defendant upon her plea of guilty of the crime of attempted criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree.

Defendant agreed to be prosecuted by a superior court information charging her with criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree. In satisfaction thereof, she pleaded guilty to attempted criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree and waived her right to appeal. In accordance with the terms of the plea agreement, she was sentenced as a second felony offender to IV2 to 3 years in prison, with the recommendation that she be considered for acceptance into the shock incarceration program. Defendant now appeals.

Appellate counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment of representing defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues to be raised on appeal. Based upon our review of the record and counsel’s brief, we agree. Therefore, the judgment is affirmed and counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]; see generally People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633 [2001]).

Peters, J.P., Kane, Malone Jr., McCarthy and Garry, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

67 A.D.3d 1204, 888 N.Y.S.2d 440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lashbrooks-nyappdiv-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack