People v. LaSalle
228 A.D.2d 355, 644 N.Y.2d 618, 644 N.Y.S.2d 618, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7348
Opinion
[356] The record is unclear whether defendant was present at the Sandoval hearing, and, since, the decision rendered was not wholly favorable to him, we remand to the trial court for a hearing on this issue, and hold the appeal in abeyance pending such hearing (People v Rodriguez, 216 AD2d 16; see also, People v Monclavo, 87 NY2d 1029). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Rosenberger, Rubin and Williams, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. LaSalle, 228 A.D.2d 355, 644 N.Y.2d 618, 644 N.Y.S.2d 618, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7348 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
228 A.D.2d 355 (People v. LaSalle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Monclavo
666 N.E.2d 175 (New York Court of Appeals, 1996)
People v. Rodriguez
216 A.D.2d 16 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)