Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. LaSalle

People v. LaSalle

228 A.D.2d 355, 644 N.Y.2d 618, 644 N.Y.S.2d 618, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7348
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 25, 1996
StatusPublished

This text of 228 A.D.2d 355 (People v. LaSalle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. LaSalle, 228 A.D.2d 355, 644 N.Y.2d 618, 644 N.Y.S.2d 618, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7348 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

[356]*356The record is unclear whether defendant was present at the Sandoval hearing, and, since, the decision rendered was not wholly favorable to him, we remand to the trial court for a hearing on this issue, and hold the appeal in abeyance pending such hearing (People v Rodriguez, 216 AD2d 16; see also, People v Monclavo, 87 NY2d 1029). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Rosenberger, Rubin and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Monclavo
666 N.E.2d 175 (New York Court of Appeals, 1996)
People v. Rodriguez
216 A.D.2d 16 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
228 A.D.2d 355, 644 N.Y.2d 618, 644 N.Y.S.2d 618, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lasalle-nyappdiv-1996.