People v. LaRocco

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. LaRocco

253 A.D.2d 469, 675 N.Y.S.2d 320, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8845

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 10, 1998·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Finnegan, J.), imposed September 17, 1997, on the ground that it is excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The People do not contest the defendant’s claim that his waiver of the right to appeal was ineffective (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1). We have considered the defendant’s contention that his sentence was excessive, and find it to be without merit (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Copertino, Sullivan and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Finnegan, J.), imposed September 17, 1997, on the ground that it is excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The People do not contest the defendant’s claim that his waiver of the right to appeal was ineffective (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1). We have considered the defendant’s contention that his sentence was excessive, and find it to be without merit (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Copertino, Sullivan and McGinity, JJ., concur.

People v. LaRocco, 253 A.D.2d 469, 675 N.Y.S.2d 320, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8845 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

253 A.D.2d 469 (People v. LaRocco) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related