People v. Larner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Larner

285 A.D. 817, 136 N.Y.S.2d 504, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5695

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 10, 1955

StatusPublished

This text of 285 A.D. 817 (People v. Larner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Larner, 285 A.D. 817, 136 N.Y.S.2d 504, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5695 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Borough of Queens, convicting him of the crime of violating subdivision 5-a of section 70 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law (leaving the scene of an accident), and from the sentence. Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial ordered. Upon the record the People failed to establish defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. There was no proof of any damage to complainant’s car, but such proof may be made available on a new trial. No separate appeal lies from the sentence, which has been reviewed on the appeal from the judgment. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, MaeCrate, Schmidt and Murphy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Borough of Queens, convicting him of the crime of violating subdivision 5-a of section 70 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law (leaving the scene of an accident), and from the sentence. Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial ordered. Upon the record the People failed to establish defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. There was no proof of any damage to complainant’s car, but such proof may be made available on a new trial. No separate appeal lies from the sentence, which has been reviewed on the appeal from the judgment. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, MaeCrate, Schmidt and Murphy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

285 A.D. 817, 136 N.Y.S.2d 504, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5695, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-larner-nyappdiv-1955.