People v. LARIO-MUNOZ

Michigan Supreme Court

People v. LARIO-MUNOZ

767 N.W.2d 442, 483 Mich. 1130

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 9, 2009

Docket138416

StatusPublished

This text of 767 N.W.2d 442 (People v. LARIO-MUNOZ) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. LARIO-MUNOZ, 767 N.W.2d 442, 483 Mich. 1130 (Mich. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

Pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals and we reinstate the ruling of the Kent Circuit Court granting the defendant a new trial. The Court of Appeals erred by finding that the circuit court abused its discretion in deciding to grant the motion for a new trial. People v Blackston, 481 Mich 451, 460 (2008). The ruling on the motion did not fall outside the range of principled outcomes. People v Babcock, 469 Mich 247, 269 (2003). Court of Appeals No. 275509.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals and we reinstate the ruling of the Kent Circuit Court granting the defendant a new trial. The Court of Appeals erred by finding that the circuit court abused its discretion in deciding to grant the motion for a new trial. People v Blackston, 481 Mich 451, 460 (2008). The ruling on the motion did not fall outside the range of principled outcomes. People v Babcock, 469 Mich 247, 269 (2003). Court of Appeals No. 275509.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

767 N.W.2d 442, 483 Mich. 1130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lario-munoz-mich-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack