People v. LARIO-MUNOZ

Michigan Supreme Court

People v. LARIO-MUNOZ

767 N.W.2d 442, 483 Mich. 1130

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided July 9, 2009·No. 138416·Published

Opinion

Pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals and we reinstate the ruling of the Kent Circuit Court granting the defendant a new trial. The Court of Appeals erred by finding that the circuit court abused its discretion in deciding to grant the motion for a new trial. People v Blackston, 481 Mich 451, 460 (2008). The ruling on the motion did not fall outside the range of principled outcomes. People v Babcock, 469 Mich 247, 269 (2003). Court of Appeals No. 275509.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals and we reinstate the ruling of the Kent Circuit Court granting the defendant a new trial. The Court of Appeals erred by finding that the circuit court abused its discretion in deciding to grant the motion for a new trial. People v Blackston, 481 Mich 451, 460 (2008). The ruling on the motion did not fall outside the range of principled outcomes. People v Babcock, 469 Mich 247, 269 (2003). Court of Appeals No. 275509.

People v. LARIO-MUNOZ, 767 N.W.2d 442, 483 Mich. 1130 (Mich. 2009).

Pincite

767 N.W.2d 442 (People v. LARIO-MUNOZ) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related