People v. Laricos
This text of 73 A.D.2d 652 (People v. Laricos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court,. Kings County, rendered September 22, 1978, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial of a motion to suppress certain evidence. Judgment reversed, on the law, motion to suppress granted, and case remitted to Criminal Term for further proceedings. Although defendant, expressed his desire to consult with an attorney and to remain silent, the authorities failed to act on these requests. In fact, they tried to dissuade defendant from exercising these rights. This conduct is clearly inconsistent with the authorities’ obligation to "scrupulously honor” a defendant’s right to "cut off the questioning” (sée People v [653]*653Grant, 45 NY2d 366, 374). Thus, the statements made by defendant to an Assistant District Attorney should have been suppressed. Titone, J. P., Mangano, Rabin and Gibbons, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
73 A.D.2d 652, 422 N.Y.S.2d 731, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14486, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-laricos-nyappdiv-1979.