People v. Larareyes

135 A.D.3d 961, 23 N.Y.S.3d 588, 2016 NY Slip Op 00519, 2016 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 529
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 27, 2016·No. 2014-11532·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County (Toomey, J.), imposed November 17, 2014, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257 [2011]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 257 [2006]; People v Fortier, 130 AD3d 642, 643 [2015]; People v Pressley, 116 AD3d 794, 796 [2014]) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, contrary to the defendant’s contention, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Eng, P.J., Balkin, Hall, Cohen and Maltese, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Larareyes, 135 A.D.3d 961, 23 N.Y.S.3d 588, 2016 NY Slip Op 00519, 2016 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 529 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

135 A.D.3d 961 (People v. Larareyes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Fortier
130 A.D.3d 642 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Pressley
116 A.D.3d 794 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)