People v. Lara

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Lara

219 A.D.2d 608, 631 N.Y.S.2d 526, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9217

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Lara. Read the opinion of the Court — 199 A.D.2d 419 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 11, 1995·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (R. Goldberg, J.), rendered September 29, 1993, convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree and attempted robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Under the totality of the circumstances, the defendant was afforded meaningful representation (see, People v Flores, 84 NY2d 184, 187; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147).

Further, the sentence imposed upon the defendant was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). O’Brien, J. P., Santucci, Joy and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (R. Goldberg, J.), rendered September 29, 1993, convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree and attempted robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Under the totality of the circumstances, the defendant was afforded meaningful representation (see, People v Flores, 84 NY2d 184, 187; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147).

Further, the sentence imposed upon the defendant was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). O’Brien, J. P., Santucci, Joy and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

People v. Lara, 219 A.D.2d 608, 631 N.Y.S.2d 526, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9217 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

219 A.D.2d 608 (People v. Lara) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related