People v. Lara
This text of 219 A.D.2d 608 (People v. Lara) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (R. Goldberg, J.), rendered September 29, 1993, convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree and attempted robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Under the totality of the circumstances, the defendant was afforded meaningful representation (see, People v Flores, 84 NY2d 184, 187; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147).
Further, the sentence imposed upon the defendant was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). O’Brien, J. P., Santucci, Joy and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
219 A.D.2d 608, 631 N.Y.S.2d 526, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lara-nyappdiv-1995.