People v. LaPuma

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. LaPuma

264 A.D.2d 448, 693 N.Y.S.2d 450, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8677

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 16, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 264 A.D.2d 448 (People v. LaPuma) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. LaPuma, 264 A.D.2d 448, 693 N.Y.S.2d 450, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8677 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the County Court, Westchester County (Smith, J.), imposed February 17, 1998, under Indictment No. 96-1405, upon his conviction of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, after a nonjury trial, the sentence being indeterminate terms of 25 years to life imprisonment upon his conviction of murder in the second degree and 4 to 8 years inprisonment upon his conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, to run concurrently.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80, 83). Santucci, J. P., Joy, Feuerstein and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the County Court, Westchester County (Smith, J.), imposed February 17, 1998, under Indictment No. 96-1405, upon his conviction of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, after a nonjury trial, the sentence being indeterminate terms of 25 years to life imprisonment upon his conviction of murder in the second degree and 4 to 8 years inprisonment upon his conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, to run concurrently.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80, 83). Santucci, J. P., Joy, Feuerstein and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

264 A.D.2d 448, 693 N.Y.S.2d 450, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8677, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lapuma-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack