People v. Lantigua

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Lantigua

122 A.D.3d 554, 995 N.Y.S.2d 680

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 25, 2014

Docket2908/90 13624 13623

StatusPublished

This text of 122 A.D.3d 554 (People v. Lantigua) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Lantigua, 122 A.D.3d 554, 995 N.Y.S.2d 680 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ruth Pickholz, J.), entered July 10, 2012, which denied defendant’s CPL 440.10 motion to vacate a judgment, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s claim under Padilla v Kentucky (559 US 356 [2010]) is unavailing, because that decision has no retroactive application to defendant’s case (see People v Baret, 23 NY3d 777 [2014]).

Concur — Friedman, J.E, Renwick, Moskowitz, Richter and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ruth Pickholz, J.), entered July 10, 2012, which denied defendant’s CPL 440.10 motion to vacate a judgment, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s claim under Padilla v Kentucky (559 US 356 [2010]) is unavailing, because that decision has no retroactive application to defendant’s case (see People v Baret, 23 NY3d 777 [2014]).

Concur — Friedman, J.E, Renwick, Moskowitz, Richter and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

122 A.D.3d 554, 995 N.Y.S.2d 680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lantigua-nyappdiv-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack