People v. Lantigua

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Lantigua

289 A.D.2d 21, 733 N.Y.S.2d 356, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11620

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 4, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 289 A.D.2d 21 (People v. Lantigua) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Lantigua, 289 A.D.2d 21, 733 N.Y.S.2d 356, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11620 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William Wetzel, J.), rendered October 28, 1997, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, and sentencing her to a term of 4 years to life, and order, same court and Justice, entered on or about April 18, 2000, which denied defendant’s motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate the judgment of conviction, unanimously affirmed.

The record establishes that defendant received meaningful representation in connection with her advantageous guilty plea (see, People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 713-714; People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 404). Defendant was not deprived of effective assistance as a result of counsel’s failure to pursue a speedy trial motion because, based on our examination of the record, we conclude that such a motion would have been unsuccessful. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Mazzarelli, Wallach and Marlow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William Wetzel, J.), rendered October 28, 1997, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, and sentencing her to a term of 4 years to life, and order, same court and Justice, entered on or about April 18, 2000, which denied defendant’s motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate the judgment of conviction, unanimously affirmed.

The record establishes that defendant received meaningful representation in connection with her advantageous guilty plea (see, People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 713-714; People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 404). Defendant was not deprived of effective assistance as a result of counsel’s failure to pursue a speedy trial motion because, based on our examination of the record, we conclude that such a motion would have been unsuccessful. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Mazzarelli, Wallach and Marlow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

289 A.D.2d 21, 733 N.Y.S.2d 356, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lantigua-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack