People v. Lantigua

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Lantigua

271 A.D.2d 269, 706 N.Y.S.2d 630, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4123

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 11, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 271 A.D.2d 269 (People v. Lantigua) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Lantigua, 271 A.D.2d 269, 706 N.Y.S.2d 630, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4123 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William Wetzel, J.), rendered October 31, 1997, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 6 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea was properly denied after defendant was afforded a sufficient opportunity to be heard. The sentencing court’s inquiry was sufficient under the circumstances. Defendant expressly withdrew his challenge to [270]*270the predicate felony statement. We have considered and rejected defendant’s remaining claims. Concur — Lerner, J. P., Andrias, Saxe, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William Wetzel, J.), rendered October 31, 1997, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 6 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea was properly denied after defendant was afforded a sufficient opportunity to be heard. The sentencing court’s inquiry was sufficient under the circumstances. Defendant expressly withdrew his challenge to [270]*270the predicate felony statement. We have considered and rejected defendant’s remaining claims. Concur — Lerner, J. P., Andrias, Saxe, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

271 A.D.2d 269, 706 N.Y.S.2d 630, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lantigua-nyappdiv-2000.