People v. Lanthier

218 N.E.2d 340, 17 N.Y.2d 877, 271 N.Y.S.2d 305, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1284
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 9, 1966
StatusPublished

This text of 218 N.E.2d 340 (People v. Lanthier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Lanthier, 218 N.E.2d 340, 17 N.Y.2d 877, 271 N.Y.S.2d 305, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1284 (N.Y. 1966).

Opinion

Order affirmed upon the ground that no sufficient showing was made to support the bare allegation of defendant’s counsel concerning defendant’s mental state. We pass on no other question. (Cf. People v. Smyth, 3 NY 2d 184; People v. Dowdle, 16 N Y 2d 1037.) No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fttld, Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi, Bergan and Keating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Smyth
143 N.E.2d 922 (New York Court of Appeals, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
218 N.E.2d 340, 17 N.Y.2d 877, 271 N.Y.S.2d 305, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lanthier-ny-1966.