People v. Lanorith
97 A.D.3d 765, 947 N.Y.2d 911
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 18, 2012·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The defendant’s knowing, voluntary, and intelligent waiver of his right to appeal forecloses appellate review of that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress certain identification testimony, and his contention that his sentence was excessive (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256-257 [2006]; People v Kemp, 94 NY2d 831, 833 [1999]). Rivera, J.P., Eng, Lott and Miller, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Lanorith, 97 A.D.3d 765, 947 N.Y.2d 911 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).
97 A.D.3d 765 (People v. Lanorith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Lanorith
123 A.D.3d 1056 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)