People v. Lanier

163 A.D.2d 902, 558 N.Y.S.2d 424, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9623

This text of 163 A.D.2d 902 (People v. Lanier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Lanier, 163 A.D.2d 902, 558 N.Y.S.2d 424, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9623 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The testimony of the infant victims that defendant, their mother’s boyfriend, had previously disciplined them by beating them with an extension cord, belts, or switches, was properly admitted to show the victims’ continuing fear of defendant as evidence of forcible compulsion (see, People v Thompson, 158 AD2d 563).

We reject defendant’s contention that prosecutorial misconduct deprived him of a fair trial. (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court, Drury, J.—rape, first degree.) Present— Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Lowery, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Thompson
158 A.D.2d 563 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
163 A.D.2d 902, 558 N.Y.S.2d 424, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lanier-nyappdiv-1990.