People v. Langrin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Langrin

274 A.D.2d 592, 712 N.Y.S.2d 395, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8319

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 31, 2000

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 274 A.D.2d 592 (People v. Langrin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Langrin, 274 A.D.2d 592, 712 N.Y.S.2d 395, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8319 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from three judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), all rendered January 22, 1997, convicting him of burglary in the first degree under Indictment No. 1689/ 96, robbery in the first degree under Indictment No. 1892/96, and robbery in the first degree under Indictment No. 1881/96, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). O’Brien, J. P., Altman, Friedmann, McGinity and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from three judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), all rendered January 22, 1997, convicting him of burglary in the first degree under Indictment No. 1689/ 96, robbery in the first degree under Indictment No. 1892/96, and robbery in the first degree under Indictment No. 1881/96, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). O’Brien, J. P., Altman, Friedmann, McGinity and Smith, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

274 A.D.2d 592, 712 N.Y.S.2d 395, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-langrin-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack