People v. Langhorne
This text of 39 A.D.3d 564 (People v. Langhorne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Braslow, J.), rendered November 2, 2005, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention regarding the imposition of a sentence which was greater than that originally promised to [565]*565him at the time of his plea of guilty is not preserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v K.F., 208 AD2d 948 [1994]; People v Ellis, 162 AD2d 701 [1990]). Mastro, J.P., Ritter, Skelos, Garni and McCarthy, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
39 A.D.3d 564, 831 N.Y.S.2d 722, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-langhorne-nyappdiv-2007.