People v. Langhorne

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Langhorne

39 A.D.3d 564, 831 N.Y.S.2d 722

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 3, 2007·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Braslow, J.), rendered November 2, 2005, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention regarding the imposition of a sentence which was greater than that originally promised to [565] him at the time of his plea of guilty is not preserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v K.F., 208 AD2d 948 [1994]; People v Ellis, 162 AD2d 701 [1990]). Mastro, J.P., Ritter, Skelos, Garni and McCarthy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Braslow, J.), rendered November 2, 2005, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention regarding the imposition of a sentence which was greater than that originally promised to [565] him at the time of his plea of guilty is not preserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v K.F., 208 AD2d 948 [1994]; People v Ellis, 162 AD2d 701 [1990]). Mastro, J.P., Ritter, Skelos, Garni and McCarthy, JJ., concur.

People v. Langhorne, 39 A.D.3d 564, 831 N.Y.S.2d 722 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

39 A.D.3d 564 (People v. Langhorne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related