People v. Langford

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Langford

199 A.D.2d 282, 605 N.Y.S.2d 942

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 6, 1993

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 199 A.D.2d 282 (People v. Langford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Langford, 199 A.D.2d 282, 605 N.Y.S.2d 942 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Eng, J.), rendered June 14, 1991, convicting her of manslaughter in the first degree, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant has raised no issue which does not fall within the scope of her waiver of her right to appeal. We find that this waiver was made voluntarily and with full knowledge of its consequences. The judgment under review should therefore be affirmed (see, People v Allen, 82 NY2d 761; People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; see also, People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1; People v Thompson, 60 NY2d 513; People v Williams, 36 NY2d 829, cert denied 423 US 873). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Balletta and Joy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Eng, J.), rendered June 14, 1991, convicting her of manslaughter in the first degree, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant has raised no issue which does not fall within the scope of her waiver of her right to appeal. We find that this waiver was made voluntarily and with full knowledge of its consequences. The judgment under review should therefore be affirmed (see, People v Allen, 82 NY2d 761; People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; see also, People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1; People v Thompson, 60 NY2d 513; People v Williams, 36 NY2d 829, cert denied 423 US 873). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Balletta and Joy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

199 A.D.2d 282, 605 N.Y.S.2d 942, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-langford-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack