People v. Lane

28 A.D.3d 1164, 813 N.Y.S.2d 329
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Lane. Read the opinion of the Court — 1 A.D.2d 801

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Livingston County Court (Gerard J. Alonzo, Jr., [1165]*1165J.), rendered December 23, 2004. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of course of sexual conduct against a child in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of course of sexual conduct against a child in the second degree (Penal Law § 130.80). The contention of defendant that he was denied effective assistance of counsel does not survive his plea of guilty “inasmuch as ‘[tihere is no showing that the plea bargaining process was infected by any allegedly ineffective assistance or that defendant entered the plea because of his attorney[’s] allegedly poor performance’ ” {People v Ginter, 23 AD3d 1064, 1065 [2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 776 [2006], quoting People v Burke, 256 AD2d 1244,1244 [1998], lv denied 93 NY2d 851 [1999]). By failing to move to withdraw his plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction, defendant failed to preserve for our review his further contention that his plea was not knowingly and voluntarily entered {see People v Greenwood, 26 AD3d 796 [2006]). Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Scudder, Kehoe, Gorski and Hayes, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Lane, 28 A.D.3d 1164, 813 N.Y.S.2d 329 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

28 A.D.3d 1164 (People v. Lane) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 130.80
New York PEN § 130.80