People v. Lane

217 A.D.2d 709, 630 N.Y.S.2d 256, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8189
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Lane. Read the opinion of the Court — 195 A.D.2d 876

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Miller, J.), rendered April 1, 1991, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the [710]*710People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it is legally sufficient to prove the defendant’s guilt of manslaughter in the first degree beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt is not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 460.15 [5]).

We have examined the defendant’s pro se contention and find it to be without merit. Bracken, J. P., Balletta, Pizzuto and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Lane, 217 A.D.2d 709, 630 N.Y.S.2d 256, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8189 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

217 A.D.2d 709 (People v. Lane) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)