People v. Lane

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Lane

23 A.D.2d 571, 256 N.Y.S.2d 921, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4923

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 8, 1965

StatusPublished

This text of 23 A.D.2d 571 (People v. Lane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Lane, 23 A.D.2d 571, 256 N.Y.S.2d 921, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4923 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant, Edward Jiumor Lane, from a judgment of the County ¡Court, Orange County, rendered December 5,1960 after a jury trial, convicting him of murder in the first degree, and sentencing him to life imprisonment. Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted for the reasons stated by the Court of Appeals in its decision on the appeal by the three eodefendants, McNeil, S'loan and Williams (People v. Lane, 10 N Y 2d 347), and in its recent decision with respect to the proper procedure for the determination of the issue of the voluntariness of a defendant’s confession (People v. Huntley, 15 N Y 2d 72). No questions of fact were considered. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant, Edward Jiumor Lane, from a judgment of the County ¡Court, Orange County, rendered December 5,1960 after a jury trial, convicting him of murder in the first degree, and sentencing him to life imprisonment. Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted for the reasons stated by the Court of Appeals in its decision on the appeal by the three eodefendants, McNeil, S'loan and Williams (People v. Lane, 10 N Y 2d 347), and in its recent decision with respect to the proper procedure for the determination of the issue of the voluntariness of a defendant’s confession (People v. Huntley, 15 N Y 2d 72). No questions of fact were considered. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 A.D.2d 571, 256 N.Y.S.2d 921, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lane-nyappdiv-1965.