People v. Lane

Appellate Court of Illinois

People v. Lane

303 N.E.2d 443, 15 Ill. App. 3d 245, 1973 Ill. App. LEXIS 1646

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedOctober 30, 1973

DocketNo. 72-72

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 303 N.E.2d 443 (People v. Lane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Lane, 303 N.E.2d 443, 15 Ill. App. 3d 245, 1973 Ill. App. LEXIS 1646 (Ill. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. JUSTICE CREBS

delivered the opinion of the court:

Appellant was convicted of rape after a bench trial in the circuit court of Madison County. Appellant was sentenced to a term of not less than four not more than eight years. The case is here on direct appeal.

Appellant contends that the trial court abused its discretion in allowing the State to reopen its case for additional proof and that the State failed to prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

We have examined the record and find that no error of law appears, that an opinion would have no precedential value, and that the evidence is not so unsatisfactory as to leave a reasonable doubt as to appellant’s guilt.

We therefore affirm in accordance with Supreme Court Rule 23. 111. Rev. Stat, ch. 110A, par. 23.

Judgment affirmed.

G. MORAN and JONES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. JUSTICE CREBS

delivered the opinion of the court:

Appellant was convicted of rape after a bench trial in the circuit court of Madison County. Appellant was sentenced to a term of not less than four not more than eight years. The case is here on direct appeal.

Appellant contends that the trial court abused its discretion in allowing the State to reopen its case for additional proof and that the State failed to prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

We have examined the record and find that no error of law appears, that an opinion would have no precedential value, and that the evidence is not so unsatisfactory as to leave a reasonable doubt as to appellant’s guilt.

We therefore affirm in accordance with Supreme Court Rule 23. 111. Rev. Stat, ch. 110A, par. 23.

Judgment affirmed.

G. MORAN and JONES, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

303 N.E.2d 443, 15 Ill. App. 3d 245, 1973 Ill. App. LEXIS 1646, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lane-illappct-1973.

Opinion

G. MORAN and JONES, JJ., concur.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack